OSINT & Trace feedback.
This is the place for invited OSINT peers to review the dashboard as a product, using fictional material only, and send the useful friction back to Christ Fields.
Use
Synthetic cases only
Send
Concrete friction and trust notes
Avoid
Real names, records, screenshots, or active cases
What to look for
Strong OSINT feedback is usually specific, plain, and a little uncomfortable. The best notes show exactly where a careful reviewer would slow down.
River Example
Synthetic review packet
Lead
Forum profile repeats a name but not enough selectors.
Source
Two posts share wording from the same original article.
Review
Address listing is old and should not be treated as current.
Can a new reviewer tell what is known, what is guessed, and what still needs verification?
Does the dashboard make repeated or mirrored sources feel less reliable than independent confirmation?
Where would you want stronger language before anyone used this on real missing-person or welfare-check work?
What is missing from the workflow before this should leave synthetic data?